Abstract
Tamarisk (Tamarix spp.), an introduced shrub or small tree, has invaded riparian areas throughout the western United States. Tamarisk invasion has been studied extensively in the Southwest, but there is little information on its performance at the northern margin of its naturalized range. We measured the canopy cover, density, height and age of tamarisk and plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) in 50 plots at 25 sites along the Bighorn, Powder, and Yellowstone rivers in southeast Montana near the northern edge of tamarisk’s western North American range. Tamarisk commonly formed thickets on open, low terraces and along over-flow channels but was less dense beneath a cottonwood canopy. Tamarisk stems routinely died back to the ground, and the oldest live stems were generally much younger than the plants. Tamarisk 30 to 40 years old in our study area usually attained heights of only 4 m or less. Height and number of live stems of tamarisk plants were 16% and 44% lower respectively under a tall cottonwood canopy. Cottonwood grows faster than tamarisk, eventually shading it and causing its decline. We believe that tamarisk will be only an understory shrub in most eastern Montana riparian forests, declining as cottonwoods form a closed canopy. Minimizing the spread of tamarisk in riparian areas in Montana can best be accomplished by managing for cottonwood.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Alt, D. and D. W. Hyndman. 1986. Roadside Geology of Montana Mountain Press, Missoula, MT, USA.
Baum, B. R. 1967. Introduced and naturalized tamarisks in the United States and Canada (Tamaricaceae). Baileya 15:19–25.
Bradley, C. E. and D. G. Smith. 1986. Plains cottonwood recruitment and survival on a prairie meandering river floodplain, Milk River, southern Alberta and northern Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:1433–1442.
Brock, J. H. 1994. Tamarix spp. (salt cedar), an invasive exotic woody plant in arid and semi-arid riparian habitats of western USA. p. 27–44 In L. C. de Waal, L. E. Child, P. M. Wade, and J. H. Brock (eds.) Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
Brotherson, J. D. and D. Field. 1987. Tamarix: impacts of a successful weed. Rangelands 9:110–112.
Busch, D. E., N. L. Ingraham, and S. D. Smith. 1992. Water uptake in woody, riparian phreatophytes of the southwestern United States: a stable isotope study. Ecological Applications 2:450–459.
Busch, D. E. and S. D. Smith. 1995. Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the southwestern U.S. Ecological Monographs 65:347–370.
Campbell, C. J. and W. A. Dick-Peddie. 1964. Comparison of phreatophyte communities on the Rio Grande in New Mexico. Ecology 45:492–502.
Carman, J. G. and J. D. Brotherson. 1982. Comparisons of sites infested and not infested with saltcedar (Tamarix pentantra) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Weed Science 30:360–364.
Cleverly, J. R., S. D. Smith, A. Sala, and D. A. Devitt. 1997. Invasive capacity of Tamarix ramosissima in a Mojave Desert flood-plain: the role of drought. Oecologia 111:12–18.
Cousens, R. and M. Mortimer. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
de Waal, L. C., L. E. Child, P. M. Wade and J. H. Brock (eds.). 1994. Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
Everitt, B. L. (1980. Ecology of saltcedar—a plea for research. Environmental Geology 3:77–84.
Everitt, B. L. 1998. Chronology of the spread of tamarisk in the central Rio Grande. Wetlands 18:658–668.
Gary, H. L. 1963. Root distribution of five-stamen tamarisk. seep-willow, and arrowweed. Forest Science 9:311–314.
Graf, W. L. 1978. Fluvial adjustments to the spread of tamarisk in the Colorado Plateau region. Geological Society of America Bulletin 89:1491–1501.
Grubb, R. T., R. L. Sheley, and R. D. Carlstrom. 1997. Saltcedar (tamarisk). Montana State University Extension Service MT9710, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Howe, W. H. and F. L. Knopf. 1991. On the imminent decline of Rio Grande cottonwoods in central New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 36:218–224.
Irvine, J. R. and N. E. West. 1979. Riparian tree species distribution and succession along the lower Escalante River, Utah. Southwestern Naturalist 24:331–346.
Lesica, P. and S. Miles. 2000. Dynamics of tamarisk invasion on the Powder, Bighorn and Yellowstone rivers of southeastern Montana. Report to the Bureau of Land Management, Miles City, MT. USA.
Mack, R. N. 1996. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders. emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 78: 107–121.
Merkel, D. L. and H. H. Hopkins. 1957. Life history of salt cedar (Tamarix gallica L.). Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 60:360–369.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association. 1982. Monthly normals of temperature, precipitation and heating and cooling degree days. Montana, 1951–1980. National Climate Center, Ashville, NC, USA.
Robinson, T. W. 1965. Introduction, spread and areal extent of saltcedar (Tamarix) in the western states. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 491-A.
Sala, A., S. D. Smith, and D. A. Devitt. 1996. Water use by Tamarix ramosissima and associated phreatophytes in a Mojave Desert floodplain. Ecological Applications 6:888–898.
Scott, M. L., G. T. Auble, and J. M. Friedman. 1997. Flood dependency of cottonwood establishment along the Missouri River, Montana, USA. Ecological Applications 7:677–690.
Sexton, J. P. 2000. Invasive potential of Tamarix ramosissima (saltcedar) in continental climates of North America. M.S. Thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Shafroth, P. B., J. M. Friedman, and L. S. Ischinger. 1995. Effects of salinity on establishment of Populus fremontii (cottonwood) and Tamarix ramosissima (saltcedar) in southwestern United States. Great Basin Naturalist 55:58–65.
Shafroth, P. B., J. C. Stromberg, and D. T. Patten. 2000. Woody riparian vegetation response to different alluvial water table regimes. Western North American Naturalist 60:66–76.
Sher, A. A., D. L. Marshall, and S. A. Gilbert. 2000. Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conservation Biology 14:1744–1754.
Smith, S. D., D. A. Devitt, A. Sala, J. R. Cleverly, and D. E. Busch. 1998. Water relations of riparian plants from warm desert regions. Wetlands 18:687–696.
Stewart-Oaten, A. 1995. Rules and judgements in statistics: three examples. Ecology 76:2001–2009.
Stromberg, J. C. 1997. Growth and survivorship of Fremont cottonwood, Gooding willow and salt cedar seedlings after large floods in central Arizona. Great Basin Naturalist 57:198–208.
Stromberg, J. C. 1998a. Dynamics of Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) and saltcedar, (Tamarix chinensis) populations along the San Pedro River, Arizona. Journal of Arid Environments 40:133–155.
Stromberg, J. C. 1998b. Functional equivalency of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) and Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) along a free-flowing river. Wetlands 18:675–686.
Swenson, J. E., P. Hendricks, and A. Farjon. 1982. Arrival and occurrence of Tamarix chinensis (tamarisk), along the Yellowstone River in Treasure and Rosebud counties, Montana. Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences 41:67–70.
Taylor, J. P. D. B. Webster, and L. M. Smith. 1999. Soil disturbance, flood management, and riparian woody plant establishment in the Rio Grande floodplain. Wetlands 19:372–382.
Turner, R. M. 1974. Quantitative and historical evidence of vegetation changes along the upper Gila River, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 655-H.
Welsh, S. L., N. D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L. C. Higgins. 1987. A Utah flora. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 9:1–894.
Williamson, M. 1993. Invaders, weeds and the risk from genetically manipulated organisms. Experientia 49:219–224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lesica, P., Miles, S. Tamarisk growth at the northern margin of its naturalized range in Montana, USA. Wetlands 21, 240–246 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0240:TGATNM]2.0.CO;2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0240:TGATNM]2.0.CO;2